Contact

Geriatrics Authority serves as a reference resource covering the clinical, regulatory, and practical dimensions of geriatric medicine in the United States. This contact page explains the geographic scope of the site, how to frame a message for the most useful response, what to expect after reaching out, and what supplementary channels exist for specific inquiries. Because geriatric care intersects with federal programs administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) clinical frameworks, and state-level licensing boards, questions submitted through this channel often benefit from clear context about which regulatory or clinical domain they touch.

Service area covered

Geriatrics Authority publishes reference-grade content with national scope across all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. Content reflects federal regulatory frameworks — including CMS Conditions of Participation (42 CFR Part 483 for long-term care facilities), the Older Americans Act administered by the Administration for Community Living (ACL), and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 — as well as clinical standards published by the AGS, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), and the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM).

State-specific regulatory variation does affect several coverage areas. Advance directive statutes, for example, differ across jurisdictions: the Uniform Health Care Decisions Act has been adopted in whole or in part by fewer than half of U.S. states, while the remaining states operate under independent statutory frameworks. Questions that hinge on state-level law — such as Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) validity, elder abuse mandatory reporting thresholds, or Medicaid spend-down rules — can be addressed in general terms, with the expectation that state agency sources or licensed professionals are the appropriate authorities for jurisdiction-specific determinations.

Coverage does not extend to non-U.S. health systems, though comparative references to the British Geriatrics Society (BGS) standards or WHO Global Strategy and Action Plan on Ageing and Health (2016–2020) appear where they illuminate the U.S. clinical context.

What to include in your message

Messages that include structured context receive more precise responses. The following breakdown identifies the categories of information most relevant to geriatrics-related inquiries:

1. Topic area — Specify the clinical domain (e.g., polypharmacy, falls and fall prevention, comprehensive geriatric assessment) or regulatory area (e.g., CMS conditions, ABIM certification, Medicare coverage).
2. Regulatory framing — If the question involves a specific statute, rule, or agency — such as CMS, the ACL, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding geriatric drug labeling (21 CFR Part 201), or the Joint Commission long-term care standards — naming that framework reduces ambiguity.
3. Care setting — Geriatric care spans acute hospital units, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), assisted living, home health, and outpatient clinic settings. Each has distinct regulatory and clinical parameters under 42 CFR.
4. Professional or lay context — Clinicians, care coordinators, family caregivers, and researchers each engage with geriatric content differently. Identifying which perspective applies helps frame the response at the right technical level.
5. Specific page or section — If the message concerns content already published on this site — such as a figure, a clinical classification, or a safety framework — citing the relevant page title or slug allows for faster, more targeted review.

Messages that omit all five of these elements typically require at least one clarifying exchange before substantive response is possible, which extends turnaround by 2 to 4 business days on average.

Response expectations

Response timelines vary by inquiry complexity and volume. Standard reference questions — those asking about published clinical frameworks, named assessment tools such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), or documented regulatory requirements — typically receive a response within 3 business days.

Inquiries that require cross-referencing primary sources — such as reconciling ABIM geriatric medicine board certification requirements against ACGME fellowship program standards, or tracing a specific CMS interpretive guideline — may take up to 7 business days.

Geriatrics Authority does not provide individualized medical advice, clinical diagnoses, treatment recommendations, or legal interpretations of regulatory requirements. This boundary is consistent with the site's function as a reference and educational resource, not a clinical consultation service. Individuals seeking clinical guidance should contact a licensed geriatrician or geriatric care team; for practitioner directories, the AGS "Find a Geriatric Care Provider" tool and the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry (AAGP) member directory are publicly accessible starting points.

Urgent patient safety concerns — including situations involving elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation — fall outside the scope of this channel. The National Center on Elder Abuse (NCEA), hosted by the ACL, maintains a 24-hour resource line and state-by-state reporting directory at ncea.acl.gov.

Additional contact options

Beyond direct message submission, structured engagement is available through topic-specific channels that align with the site's major content domains.

Content corrections and clinical accuracy flags — Errors in cited statistics, misattributed clinical definitions, or outdated regulatory references can be flagged with the specific page title, the passage in question, and the preferred corrective source. Priority is given to flags that cite named primary sources: peer-reviewed publications in journals such as the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), CMS final rules published in the Federal Register, or NIST-equivalent standards bodies where applicable.

Institutional and research inquiries — Academic institutions, health systems, and research teams with questions about geriatric assessment frameworks — including frailty assessment, functional status evaluation, or advance care planning protocols — may direct detailed inquiries through the standard message channel with "Institutional Inquiry" noted in the subject line.

Career and training pathway questions — Questions about becoming a geriatrician, geriatric psychiatry fellowship pathways, or hospice and palliative medicine fellowship eligibility are addressed through the general channel; responses reference ACGME-accredited program requirements and ABIM or American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) certification standards as the authoritative sources.

Privacy Policy

The law belongs to the people. Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 590 U.S. (2020)